Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 7, 2021

The High Dividend Strategy: Pros and Cons

Let's start with the bottom line about investing in high dividend stocks: It works, but there are significant wrinkles.  A while back, I did a 20-year study of investing in high dividend stocks.  The approach was straightforward.  I began with the S&P 500 universe and divided it into 10 groups of 50 stocks each. 

The groups were arranged by dividend yield, highest to lowest, at the beginning of each of the years.  I then tracked the total returns (dividends plus capital appreciation) of these groups for the full period.

The results were illuminating.  The highest total returns were from the group with the highest dividend yields.  The returns then descended in perfect order down to the group with the lowest dividend yields.  What's more, the aggregate return from the group with the highest returns was greater than that of the Standard & Poor's 500 and its volatility over the period was lower.

That did not mean all stocks in the group of highest yielders did well.  Quite the contrary.  The main reason for these impressive returns was surprisingly strong performance from a few stocks that did far better than they were expected to.  The majority of the stocks in the top group did not do well, but the average return was increased dramatically by a handful of huge winners.  In contrast, the group of stocks with the lowest dividend yield was the poorest performer because there were a few losers with very bad results.

The high dividend yielders, as a group, had their best showings during the weakest market years.  That's not surprising since it's well known that generous dividends tend to buffer price erosion when the market hits air pockets.  One more thing: The average performance of each of the highest yielding stocks was only so-so.  It was only as a group that they stood out.

At the same time, I did a similar study of companies using price-earnings multiples instead of dividend yields.  As might be expected, those with the lowest multiples turned in the best returns, actually a bit better than those of the highest dividend yielders.  But there was a greater variation in returns from year to year and the returns from lowest to highest did not decrease in perfect order.

With both groups, unusually high and low returns from the outliers were what caused the average returns to end up where they were.

Since each group consisted of 50 stocks, efforts to come close to replicating the results of these studies would require holding approximately that many stocks or investing in an exchange-traded fund with a similar approach.  Keep in mind, too, that the study covered two decades, so even though the numbers work over that long a period it's entirely possible, if not likely, that there will be short periods in between when the returns lag the overall market.

No strategy works all the time, but for those who are patient this one seems to be well worth considering.  Even so, investors need to be wary of obvious areas of concern.  For example, utilities often come up as possibilities when investors are looking for high dividends.  With the prospect of higher interest rates ahead, however, that may be a yellow flag before considering same.

High dividend yielding stocks offer a worthwhile opportunity, but careful consideration is essential before pulling the trigger to buy.  Especially important is the need to buy a sizable group, not just a few.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

 

203-222-9370

 

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...