Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 21, 2021

How is the Market Doing?

Despite all the noise being trumpeted by the media, the daily prattle about market moves is often wide of the mark and overloaded with information that is misleading or just plain inaccurate.  How else to explain a jump of several hundred points one day followed by a plunge the next day?  That makes no sense.

Over time, the foundation for stock valuations is underlying profitability of the companies involved.  As profits increase, stock prices rise, though not necessarily in perfect reflection.  The relationship tends to be meaningful over extended periods, but often not in shorter spans of time.  That’s all about changes in investor psychology. 

So let’s begin by defining the “market”.  If we are referring to stocks, the most common reference is to the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which consists of 30 major companies whose progress might be considered representative of the U.S. economy as a whole. The majority of the companies included here are relatively mature, growing at a more moderate pace.  But limiting the view to such a small group of giant companies essentially ignores what’s taking place with thousands of other domestic companies.  And let’s not forget that a substantial portion of the revenues these companies generate comes from non-U.S. activities.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 takes a broader view that is the benchmark for investment professionals.  The significant flaw with the S&P 500 is that the constituent companies are weighted by market capitalization.  (Market price times the number of shares outstanding equals market capitalization.)  As a result, movements of the very largest companies in the index have a disproportionate impact on changes in the index.  At the moment, the five top spots are held by Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Facebook, which combine to account for 19% of the total.  As the big guys move, so does the S&P.  It’s even more skewed when considering the top 10 companies, which altogether account for 26% of the total.

The S&P 500 can also be viewed on an equal-weighted basis.  When doing so, the price movements are quite different.  Over the latest one-year span, the S&P 500 as regularly viewed was up 57%, but on an equal-weighted basis, the gain was reduced to 45%.  For the current year to date, the differential is even broader.

The comparison gets much more interesting when viewing the Wilshire 5000 Index, which is the widest measure of the U.S. equity market, including many of the smallest companies.  For the year to date and latest year, returns from the Wilshire Index were similar to those of the S&P on an equal-weighted basis, but when measured over two and five years, the Wilshire Index had the highest returns.  That, no doubt, was due to the more rapid growth of the smaller companies in the group.

When looking abroad, the proxies for developed markets and emerging markets are EFA and EEM, two exchange-traded funds from iShares.  The results of these two have been dramatically different.  Both have essentially gone sideways for the past decade and half, but more recently they have regained momentum and kept pace with the S&P.  Given the generally more reasonable valuations found in these international markets, it is likely that they will provide more substantial returns going forward.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP® 

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t