Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 31, 2021

The Market Drops Every Year . . . and Ends Up Higher Over Time

The market drops I refer to take place over a period of a few months within one year or starting in one year and running into another.  These short periods of weakness are not to be confused with 12-month changes from yearend to yearend.

Since 1980, the Standard & Poor's 500 Index has had average interim drops of 14.3%.  In more than half of those years, the corrections, as they are euphemistically known, were 10% or more.  We hit the worst air pocket back in late 2008 to early 2009: 49%.

When this happened, more than a few investors started to wonder what was going on. Yet each time, the pullback was followed by a full recovery and annual returns ended up positive in three out of four years.

The lesson learned from this pattern is that short-term movements are for the most part reflections of changes in investor psychology.  One day, there may be a series of encouraging earnings reports.  The next day, there may be a disappointment or perhaps increased concern about rising interest rates.

Whatever the reasons for these interim shifts in stock prices, they tend to wash out over time.  And for that matter, any attempt to provide a rational basis for same is really an exercise in futility.

By analogy, consider the difference between the climate and the weather.  Data collected over extended periods makes it easy enough to suggest probable ranges of temperatures over the course of the year.  There may be minor variations, but summer usually looks like summer and winter brings Jack Frost (unless you happen to live way down south).

Forecasting weather, except perhaps a day or two before, is fraught with considerable risk. Even so, by comparison with market predictions, weather forecasting looks like a science of great merit.  Those who talk, often in measured tones, about where the market will end up – even on the same day – are just plain silly.  These things are unknowable.

As recently as the early morning hours after Election Day 2016, the Dow Jones futures indicated a plunge of more than 800 points.  But even that ominous foreshadowing was misleading.  The Dow finished the next market day with a gain of more than 250 points.

Since market valuations reflect underlying earning power, a constant multiplier applied to those earnings would yield what might be called a normal valuation.  A normal valuation, however, is rarely seen.  Higher or lower is more likely.

Over time, stocks generally sell in a range of 10 to 20 times earnings.  During the most difficult of times, as in the mid-1970s, multiples actually narrowed to high single digits.

From one standpoint, it was among the worst of times.  But when valuations get that low, it's usually a signal that stocks are on sale.  And they most definitely were.

Yet back at the beginning of the 21st Century, i.e., the dot-com era, stocks were selling at 20 to 30 times earnings . . . and higher.  Not surprisingly, it took more than a decade for underlying earnings to rise sufficiently to bring valuations back into a normal range.

So even though the concept of a normal value might be appealing, it's not a common occurrence.  Best advice: Ignore the noise of the moment and take the longer view. 

“We've long felt that the only value of stock forecasts is to make fortune tellers look good.  Short-term market forecasts are poison and should be kept locked up in a safe place, away from children and also from grown-ups who behave in the market like children.”

                                                Warren Buffet in his 1992 letter to shareholder


N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883


Any questions?  Please contact me at


Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t