Skip to main content

 SOUND ADVICE: February 3, 2021

Hedge Funds: One way to get clipped

And then there are the hedge funds, which are completely different animals. These are the funds that have been conjured up for wealthier investors and promoted with an expectation that their results will be indifferent to meanderings of the markets frequented by the investing public.

For the privilege of participating in these hallowed vehicles, one must meet specified income and asset levels.  Also, one must agree to pay fees that typically range in the area of 2% annually along with additional compensation to the managers of 20% of the profits that may be generated.

That’s a stiff price to pay for dismal performance.

Hedge funds follow numerous strategies, many of which are so arcane that it would not be unreasonable to believe that even the managers themselves have no understanding of what they are doing. For the most part, their approach is to make big bets and hope those bets pay off. As with the more traditional kinds of funds, there are few standouts. Their patterns of performance invariably include a few periods of exceptional gain followed by gut-wrenching downswings.

Over the latest 25 years, the hedge funds, on average, have underperformed the S&P 500 Index by several percentage points or more annually.  Why would anyone be naive enough to believe that there could be magic here?

Notwithstanding claims the hedge funds may make about repealing the law of gravity, the potential for increased reward continues to be accompanied by exposure to increased risk.  In most cases, the risks taken by these “pros” is far greater than the rewards they are earning for their investors.

There is no free lunch. 

Beware of geeks bearing formulas.                                         

Warren Buffett

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t