Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 10, 2021

It seems as if there are as many investment websites as there are grains of sand on the beach. Each of them trumpets the merits of its own approach, yet the overwhelming majority are either lacking in substance or credibility.

There is more than enough hard information available for investors to make intelligent decisions. The problem is that there is so much information that it can become difficult to sort through and decide what is truly important. There is, in addition, widespread duplication of data, though it is not uncommon for the same data series to vary from site to site. There may be even greater variation when considering forward-looking data, which in most cases is anything but reliable.

What is most useful is data about recent company trends in revenues, earnings, borrowings, valuations, and relative strength. Less useful, or perhaps to be taken with a grain of salt, are analyst recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell). Neither these nor target prices should be taken seriously.

Recommendations generally come from sell-side analysts who prepare them as part of campaigns to interest major financial institutions in buying sizable positions and thereby earning large commissions for themselves. These recommendations are biased heavily toward the buy side simply because few institutions are interested in hearing about what to sell.

The exercise is one in which the sell-side analyst presents his idea, which may or may not fit with the institution’s objectives.  If the institution has an interest in buying, it will then apply its own sell discipline. Ergo, most recommendations are Buys.

What’s especially troublesome is that Wall Street analysts tend to make recommendations and estimates that are close to the consensus.  Why?  The main reason is that there’s little risk if your estimates were in line with the consensus and the consensus was wrong.  But if your estimates were outliers and you missed the target, you may be at risk for your job as well.

There are also websites dedicated to belief in the wisdom of the masses. These are websites that compile aggregate recommendations of both individual and ostensibly institutional investors in an effort to lead the way to the truth. Some have taken the proposition one step further and dedicated relatively small funds that invest according to the consensus.

To all of these, I say “best of luck.”  The reality is straightforward: Over time, improving company fundamentals will lead to higher prices for their shares.  That’s the basic equation.  Ignore it at your own peril.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883 

203-222-9370

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more