Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 10, 2021

It seems as if there are as many investment websites as there are grains of sand on the beach. Each of them trumpets the merits of its own approach, yet the overwhelming majority are either lacking in substance or credibility.

There is more than enough hard information available for investors to make intelligent decisions. The problem is that there is so much information that it can become difficult to sort through and decide what is truly important. There is, in addition, widespread duplication of data, though it is not uncommon for the same data series to vary from site to site. There may be even greater variation when considering forward-looking data, which in most cases is anything but reliable.

What is most useful is data about recent company trends in revenues, earnings, borrowings, valuations, and relative strength. Less useful, or perhaps to be taken with a grain of salt, are analyst recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell). Neither these nor target prices should be taken seriously.

Recommendations generally come from sell-side analysts who prepare them as part of campaigns to interest major financial institutions in buying sizable positions and thereby earning large commissions for themselves. These recommendations are biased heavily toward the buy side simply because few institutions are interested in hearing about what to sell.

The exercise is one in which the sell-side analyst presents his idea, which may or may not fit with the institution’s objectives.  If the institution has an interest in buying, it will then apply its own sell discipline. Ergo, most recommendations are Buys.

What’s especially troublesome is that Wall Street analysts tend to make recommendations and estimates that are close to the consensus.  Why?  The main reason is that there’s little risk if your estimates were in line with the consensus and the consensus was wrong.  But if your estimates were outliers and you missed the target, you may be at risk for your job as well.

There are also websites dedicated to belief in the wisdom of the masses. These are websites that compile aggregate recommendations of both individual and ostensibly institutional investors in an effort to lead the way to the truth. Some have taken the proposition one step further and dedicated relatively small funds that invest according to the consensus.

To all of these, I say “best of luck.”  The reality is straightforward: Over time, improving company fundamentals will lead to higher prices for their shares.  That’s the basic equation.  Ignore it at your own peril.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883 

203-222-9370

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more