Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 13, 2021

Why Asset Allocation is Important

Although asset allocation and diversification are words that are regularly used when thinking about proper portfolio construction, more often than not lip service is not followed by actual attention to the process of putting together a grouping of investments that makes sense.  What makes sense is a collection of securities within a variety of asset classes with the objective of gaining worthwhile returns while limiting risk exposure.

It's not hard to do.

One traditional approach to asset allocation has been a 60/40 split between stocks and bonds, decreasing the percentage allocation to equities as investors get older.  This has not been a bad way to go, but simply thinking in terms of U.S. stocks and bonds overlooks the opportunities available by considering a wider variety of asset classes, including international stocks, real estate, and high yield (a.k.a., junk) bonds.

A few years ago, I completed a study of asset class returns from 1989 thru August 31, 2017 that was quite telling.  In that study, I reviewed the yearly returns, the volatility of returns (standard deviation), and the number of negative returns over the period.  The asset classes included were growth stocks, value stocks, large cap stocks, small cap stocks, developed country stocks, emerging markets stocks, investment grade bonds, high yield bonds, real estate stocks, and commodities.

Here are the results:

The highest annual returns, by far, over the 28-year period were from emerging markets stocks: 16.0%.  BUT, those returns were accompanied by two and half times the volatility of the average of all asset classes.  What's more, for this asset class, 12 of the 28 years showed losses, one in excess of 50%.

Four of the asset classes (growth stocks, large cap stocks, value stocks, and real estate stocks) provided returns in the 11.5-12.0% range, though here too the volatility was still 30% higher than the average of all asset classes. For this group, there were five down years over the period.

The weakest returns were provided by investment grade bonds, which averaged gains of 7.0% annually and had only three down years.  Even so, that performance may not be indicative of the future for this asset class since bonds had a four-decade rally from 1980 on as interest rates plunged from the mid teens to near zero in the wake of the Great Recession of 2008-9. Going forward, it’s likely interest rates will rise and bond prices will fall.  Not an encouraging prospect.

A simple solution worth considering would be to construct a portfolio with equal percentages allocated to each of the 10 asset classes.  For the period considered, the annual returns would have been 10.2% with overall volatility lower than all asset classes other than investment grade bonds.  Taking this one step further, one might well choose to stay away from commodities, in which case annual returns would have increased by 0.5% without a significant jump in risk.

Although there are numerous combinations of asset classes that are probably worth considering (and potentially more profitable), the key point is that with this kind of real diversification it's quite likely that worthwhile gains will accrue while dampening risk significantly.

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t
Post a Comment
Read more