Skip to main content

Sound Advice: November 11, 2021

Why You Should Be Concerned About High Stock Prices 

In the wake of the market plunge that took place in late February and March, the stock market staged an extraordinary comeback.  But even with the breaking news that vaccines now in Phase III clinical trials are showing promising results, we are all better advised to take a deep breath and put things in perspective.

Let’s begin with the reality that just prior to the latest jump in prices, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index on an equal-weighted basis was actually down for the year to date.  It gets worse since the S&P has been largely driven by the huge advances of the FAANG stocks: Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google.  Ex those companies, the typical year-to-date result for most stocks was a loss between 5% and 10%. So much for talk about a roaring bull market.

Given this perspective, the question to be asked is whether stock valuations are too high?  This can be viewed in two ways. For the FAANGs, individual valuations range between 30 and 70 times earnings, which some may view as appropriate when compared to projected future growth.  This is debatable.

The current valuation of the S&P 500 is slightly above 21 times, compared with 19 times excluding the FAANGs.  Either way, the numbers are rich, but still well below the astronomical peak of 1999-2000.

The main arguments in support of currently high stock valuations are the continuation of low interest rates and the prospective recovery in post-pandemic earnings.  Add to this the huge jump in the savings rate, which at some point will lead to a big pickup in spending, and the possibility of another major stimulus bill.

There is some merit to this reasoning, but the aftermath of what may be a sugar high late in the second half of next year and into 2022 will probably be a moderation of the pace of recovery.  Since it will take a while for corporate earnings to get back up to the level of 2019, it would be overly optimistic to expect that stock valuations will move ahead quickly.  More likely, there will be continued ups and downs within a broad trading range while the economy gets back on its feet and the devastation among smaller businesses starts to be repaired.

Although many investors would be thrilled to watch the averages climb steadily over the months ahead, that may well be the worst possible scenario. We saw that kind of advance during 1999-2000 and recall far too much talk about how "It's Different This Time." 

Trust me.  It's not.

If I had my druthers, the market would move sideways through the remainder of the year and well into 2021, giving earnings time to catch up.  But more likely, there will be a significant pullback between now and then.  In the past, there has been a correction of 10% or so in two out of three years.

Is this something to worry about?  Not really, though it suggests it would be best to ignore thoughts about missing a rally and instead prepare for the better opportunities that would be available when prices come down to more reasonable levels. 

The problem is that investors tend to do the opposite of what makes sense.  When stocks are on sale, they're too nervous to take advantage of bargains.  Yet when prices soar, they can't wait to pay up.

This behavior is counterintuitive.  In every other part of our financial lives, we look for the best deals.  But with investing, most people tend to buy high and sell low.  Not surprisingly, studies have shown that this tendency usually backfires. The latest Dalbar study of investor returns indicated that the typical investor in equity mutual funds had gotten an annual return of only 3.9% over the last 20 years.  That compares with 5.9% for the S&P 500 and 7.0% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average.                        

When prices are as high as they are now, efforts to dial down risk will probably be well rewarded.  A word to the wise.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...