Skip to main content

Sound Advice: October 7, 2020

Why Dollar-Cost Averaging is a Good Idea 

At times such as these when more than a few reasonably experienced Wall Streeters have commented on the richness of current stock valuations, it makes sense to review worthwhile investment approaches that have been tested over time.  One that tends to get a lot of lip service, though certainly less attention in practice, is Dollar-Cost Averaging.  With that strategy, the investor commits to buying a fixed-dollar amount at regular time intervals, which might be monthly, quarterly or some other period.

One of the key arguments in favor of Dollar-Cost Averaging is the benefit of gaining an average cost over time, rather than committing all at once and risking the possibility of being on the cusp of a significant market downturn.  For most investors, this benefit may sound more promising than it really is.  Why?  Since the market moves up two-thirds of the time, the probability is that the average prices paid will be higher than they might have been from a one-time investment.

The Main Benefit is Psychological 

So if we accept the fact that the odds are not in your favor, why bother moving ahead in this fashion?  The best reason I can think of is that it bolsters investors' confidence in the implementation of their plans. 

Understanding the importance of psychology in the investment process, it's essential to provide an adequate foundation of sensibility when getting under way.  Although most of us don't want to talk about it, there's always the nagging thought that something you just bought will go down and whatever you just sold might start going up.  When this sense is extrapolated to a series of commitments, it takes on an even greater dimension.

On those occasions when this fear is followed by an unpleasant reality, it leaves an emotional blemish that may linger.  It's well known that psychology plays a critical role in short-term market movements, so new commitments that begin on this note have a habit of resonating later on during periodic market corrections and reinforcing thoughts of bailing out at the wrong time.

It's well known that investors are their own worst enemies, which suggests that efforts to limit damages from irrational decision-making are well worth pursuing.  The Dalbar study of investor behavior underscores this truth.  Over the latest 30 years, investors in equity mutual funds had returns that were 60% worse than those of the Standard & Poor's 500.  They bought when the averages were high and ran for the exits when the market hit air pockets.  Exactly the opposite of what should have happened.

The process of averaging in over a period of time builds essential psychological support into the equation.  Rather than worrying about price movements after adding positions, the investor looks forward to changes with the assurance that his process will smooth the fluctuations and provide him with an average of the prices prevailing over the period. Thus, price changes are anticipated and managed, rather than feared.

It works both ways.

The same is true for the selling part of the investment process.  In addition to the importance of timing sales to reduce tax liability (unless there's a compelling reason to sell all at once), the psychological benefit is equally true when reducing or eliminating holdings.  I suspect this is even more so with holdings that have increased substantially in value. 

On one hand, there's concern about capturing gains that are already in place.  But on the other hand, one has to wonder whether the investment is one of those rare birds such as Google or Apple that seems to have no upside limit.

In both directions, a measured approach tends to feel a lot better.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: June 17, 2020

Rock and a Hard Place Regardless of your age, impressions from childhood linger.  As the first days of summer approach, we all remember the feeling that accompanied the end of a school year.  Yet as much as many of us would like to believe we again have the summertime freedom to do as we wish, the reality is quite the opposite. Although months of confinement and limitations on social interaction have increased our personal discomfort and severely impacted the business community, our current situation is not analogous to the end of any school year.  It’s quite the opposite. There is every reason to continue wearing face masks, social distancing, and avoiding close contact with others.  Nothing suggests that we can modify our behavior significantly or resume patterns of daily living we enjoyed only a few months ago. There are no meaningful advances in medical treatments.  At best, there are attempts to combine different approaches...