Skip to main content

Sound Advice: October 14, 2020

“I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”

                                                                            Thomas Jefferson

History is a useful, though not infallible, guide to what lies ahead. Invariably, excess in one direction is followed by offsetting movement in the other direction.  Strength is followed by weakness and vice-versa.  Within the universe of investments, there are those that do better than the averages and those that do worse.  When interest rates are low and credit is loose, the stage is set for an acceleration of growth.  When interest rates are climbing and credit gets tighter, the brakes are being applied to economic advances.

Stocks tend to rise when investors expect earnings to rise.  They weaken when the view ahead is less rosy.  Bonds rise when interest rates are dropping. Typically, this takes place when monetary policy eases or when investors’ fears prompt a flight to quality.  As business conditions improve, monetary policy tends to tighten, causing bond prices to fall and bond yields to rise.  As interest rates change, the impact on prices is greatest on bonds with the longest maturities and least on those maturing in the near future.

At all times, the issue is what lies ahead, not what has already happened. More specifically, what investors do today reflects what they expect to happen tomorrow. The reality that follows is often quite different from what was expected. Changes in investor psychology, and their impact on market prices, tend to be far greater than the fluctuations in underlying fundamentals they are supposed to be reflecting. 

A company with an unblemished record of annual advances may be viewed as one with below average risk and above average earnings predictability, but that history will do little to dampen the impact of the speed bumps that loom ahead. Companies with checkered records will generally be accorded leaner valuations, primarily due to the increase in perceived risk.

One of the better examples of the need to look ahead is cyclical companies. Those are companies that regularly move through periods of lean and rich results. Those that produce raw materials such as steel, paper, and fertilizer are of this type. When their profits are in a trough, their shares tend to receive the richest valuations (price-earnings multiples) since investors are aware that profits are atypically low and will rise during the next boom cycle. Conversely, when profits of these companies are peaking, valuations will be low, reflecting the likelihood that a downturn will soon follow.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more