Skip to main content

Sound Advice: October 14, 2020

“I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”

                                                                            Thomas Jefferson

History is a useful, though not infallible, guide to what lies ahead. Invariably, excess in one direction is followed by offsetting movement in the other direction.  Strength is followed by weakness and vice-versa.  Within the universe of investments, there are those that do better than the averages and those that do worse.  When interest rates are low and credit is loose, the stage is set for an acceleration of growth.  When interest rates are climbing and credit gets tighter, the brakes are being applied to economic advances.

Stocks tend to rise when investors expect earnings to rise.  They weaken when the view ahead is less rosy.  Bonds rise when interest rates are dropping. Typically, this takes place when monetary policy eases or when investors’ fears prompt a flight to quality.  As business conditions improve, monetary policy tends to tighten, causing bond prices to fall and bond yields to rise.  As interest rates change, the impact on prices is greatest on bonds with the longest maturities and least on those maturing in the near future.

At all times, the issue is what lies ahead, not what has already happened. More specifically, what investors do today reflects what they expect to happen tomorrow. The reality that follows is often quite different from what was expected. Changes in investor psychology, and their impact on market prices, tend to be far greater than the fluctuations in underlying fundamentals they are supposed to be reflecting. 

A company with an unblemished record of annual advances may be viewed as one with below average risk and above average earnings predictability, but that history will do little to dampen the impact of the speed bumps that loom ahead. Companies with checkered records will generally be accorded leaner valuations, primarily due to the increase in perceived risk.

One of the better examples of the need to look ahead is cyclical companies. Those are companies that regularly move through periods of lean and rich results. Those that produce raw materials such as steel, paper, and fertilizer are of this type. When their profits are in a trough, their shares tend to receive the richest valuations (price-earnings multiples) since investors are aware that profits are atypically low and will rise during the next boom cycle. Conversely, when profits of these companies are peaking, valuations will be low, reflecting the likelihood that a downturn will soon follow.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more