Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 9, 2020

A Tale of Two Markets

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we were all going to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way----in short, the period was so far like the present period that some of its noisiest authorities insisted upon its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only."

Charles Dickens

The words Dickens wrote 161 years ago resonate eerily with where we are today.  For some people, it is indeed the best of times.  For far too many others, however, it is among the most difficult of times.

Amid the overwhelming flow of each day's news, we learn about the movements of the stock market, which until recently appeared to be on a fast track to the ionosphere.  Recent pullbacks, though, suggest that it is time for a reality check.

The market that the media usually refers to is either the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.  The Dow consists of 30 well-known stocks that used to be called blue chips.  The S&P, by contrast, is far broader, including huge companies as well as tiny companies.

Although the S&P appears to provide a more representative view, it does not.  Why? Because the S&P is weighted heavily toward the tech companies with the greatest market valuations.  These are often referred to as the FAANGs: Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

For the year to date, the average gain for these five stocks is 51.7%.  If, however, we view the S&P Index on an equal-weighted basis, the year-to-date result turns out to be a loss of 10.6%.  That still includes the FAANGs.  Excluding those companies, the numbers are even worse, which is why many investors are still wondering why their portfolios are down even though the news media seems to indicate otherwise.

Are these great companies?  They are, but there are important issues to ponder.  In all cases, as companies grow, their potential for further growth diminishes.  Companies such as Amazon and Netflix have had extraordinary gains due to the pandemic, but there will come a time when folks are out and about again, not living online.

A decade and a half ago, Apple was at best an also-ran.  Then came the iPhone, which along with Samsung has largely saturated the world with handheld devices.  There may be more to come, but at a moderating pace.

Facebook, too, has been a major beneficiary of the current constraints, replacing actual social contact with digital contact, which may be better than nothing, but not quite as satisfying.

From the perspective of fundamental analysis, these are all richly valued companies, ranging from 34 times earnings to 121 times earnings.  That compares with traditional market valuations of 15 to 18 times.

When stock valuations are high, one or more of the following factors are needed to support them: an above average rate of future growth, consistent past growth, and low interest rates.  A hesitation in growth, even for a short time, can undermine a stock's price.

Chasing them may not be a good idea.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more