Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 5, 2020

"If you cannot control your emotions, you cannot control your money."
Warren Buffett

As much as all of us would like to believe we can always make rational decisions about our finances, the reality is otherwise.  When our personal situations are promising and the business climate is favorable, we readily respond to questions about risk tolerance and affirm our ability to deal with bumps in the road ahead.  Yet during times of extreme volatility, such as we experienced in late Spring, our rational selves are frequently overwhelmed by our emotional selves.

When this year's roller coaster was headed for its steepest drop, few of us were able to keep cool heads and accept the reality that the plunge was not signaling the end of the world.

There have been many plunges in the past and there will be more ahead.  In only a few weeks, this latest drop approximated the extent of the pullback from late 2008 to March 9, 2009, which took place during the banking crisis.  But, as dramatic as it was, it paled in comparison with that of October 19, 1987, when the Dow dropped 22.5% in one day.  

At each of these times as well as others that have come before, these unsettling moments have proved to be exceptional buying opportunities.  

On October 19, 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell to 1,738.74.  Since then, it has climbed 1435%.

On March 9, 2009, the Dow fell to 6,547.05.  Since then, it has climbed 308%.

On March 23rd this year, the Dow fell to 18,591.93.  Since then, it has climbed 44%.

Although periods of great volatility can be unsettling, they have always been the worst possible times to let emotions guide your financial thinking.  In an optimal world, one would hope to sell at the top and buy at the bottom.  We are not living in an optimal world.

Far better to appreciate the fact that the long-term path of least resistance is up.  You can rest assured that the Dow will reach 50,000 before it hits zero. 


N. Russell Wayne, CFP

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...