Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 19, 2020


10 Things Investors Need To Know

Market forecasts are totally meaningless.  There are numerous seers in the media who with great seriousness provide definitive thoughts about where the market is going tomorrow, next week, next month or next year.  What's important to understand is that short-term market movements are heavily influenced by changes in investor psychology, which are unknowable. 

And for that matter, please ignore pronouncements from so-called technical analysts who attempt to divine the future from recent price patterns.  That is what the Brits call rubbish. 

The rewards of real fundamental analysis (profitability and financial health) are reflected in changing market prices over long periods of time, i.e., market cycles of three to five years or more, not in the next few weeks.

Target prices are nonsense.  Take a look at Yahoo! Finance, enter a ticker symbol, and up comes information about the stock in question, including a target price.  At best, target prices are amusing, but it would be risky to put together a portfolio of stocks based on such expectations. 

Don't follow analysts' recommendations.  There is no reason to believe that recommendations by Wall Street analysts are at all reliable.  I have yet to come across any study that supports their merit.  Indeed, most of the analysts' recommendations are Buys.  Why? Because these are typically prepared by sell-side analysts whose (often lengthy) reports are intended to help them sell large blocks of stock to institutional buyers and earn substantial commissions.

Here's why analysts' earnings estimates tend to be close to another.  It's considered a good idea for analysts to keep their estimates close to the "Street" consensus. Because if the consensus is wrong, the usual excuse is that everyone else got it wrong, too.  But if your estimate is an outlier and you miss the actual result by a wide margin, you might be out of a job.  From the standpoint of analyst job security, consensus estimates are much safer.

Find a financial adviser who is on your side of the table.  If your search begins with a visit to the local stock brokerage office, you may well end up speaking with one of the Vice-Presidents, typically a friendly person who has been trained to put you at ease and build confidence in the chemistry between you.  So was the Wizard of Oz until they pulled the curtains back.  These are salespeople.  Period.

There are exceptions, but they are the few who recognize that working on behalf of the client is most appropriate.

Be aware that the entry level title at a brokerage office is often exalted, an obvious effort to convince you that you're dealing with a senior person.  Quite often, that's not the case.  For another, it's more than likely that your new acquaintance is not required to put your interest first.  Indeed, this person's obligation to you may be nothing more than presenting ideas that are suitable . . . and potentially quite lucrative for him/her.

What you want is an adviser who is your partner, not someone who is a glorified salesperson.  This usually means a Certified Financial Planner, a Registered Investment Advisor or a Chartered Financial Analyst.  In all cases, you need a fiduciary, one who is required to act in the best interest of the client.

Lower fees mean higher returns.  When buying stocks or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), you should not have to pay a commission.  When buying mutual funds, look first at the lists of no-transaction-fee funds offered by many brokerage houses.  Also, when buying mutual funds or exchange-traded funds, make sure to look at the funds' expense ratios.  For mutual funds, you should avoid funds with expense ratios above 1.50% and if at all possible focus on those closer to 1.00% or below.  For exchange-traded funds, expense ratios, except for those involved in unusual asset classes, should be below 0.50%.  Indeed, indexed ETFs can be found with expense ratios below 0.10%.  And finally, do not buy load funds, i.e., funds with sales charges.  That's an absolute no-no.

Stay away from the message boards.  These are chat rooms peopled by folks with a broad variety of intentions, some of which are downright harmful and misleading.  If tempted to read the trash that's put forth there, be warned that you will be in a dangerous place. The reality is that there's rarely a basis for what you may read and you can bet that serious investors will not participate.

Hedge funds are a great place to get clipped.  The average hedge fund has significantly underperformed the S&P 500 Index for many years.  For the privilege of doing poorly, investors in these funds typically pay a fee of 2% annually plus 20% of profits.  Although hedge funds might be fun to discuss  at cocktail parties, investing in them is just plain foolish.

Smart investing means seeks worthwhile returns without excessive risk exposure.  That means asset allocation based on such considerations as time horizon, risk tolerance, and need from current income.  An investor with a 20-year time horizon would be best advised to invest primarily in equities, both domestic and international.  But an investor with a shorter time horizon would want to reduce the equities and moderate interim fluctuations with increased holdings in fixed income and alternatives.

Keep your eye on the climate, not the weather.  Prices in all markets go up and down, but concerns resulting from the latest financial storms are largely wasted since they increase emotions that can lead to unwise decisions.  These storms will pass, but the long-term climate for the markets is summer.  Patience pays off handsomely.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...