Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 12, 2020

"A goal without a plan is just a wish"
Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Planning for one's financial future is a straightforward exercise, but one in which the nuances can dramatically change the outcome.  When you start on the path ahead, you have the option to change direction as you move along toward your goal.  If you don't start, as is the case more often than not, you have no options other than struggling to deal with unforeseen consequences, which may well be less than desirable.

A financial plan has four main elements: what you own (your assets), what you owe (your debts), how much you are earning (your income), and how much you are spending (your expenses).  If your assets are greater than your debts and your income over time exceeds your expenses, assuming nothing untoward happens, you're probably in good shape.

But a plan is based upon assumptions that may or may not be on target.  Among these are the rate of inflation, the rate of investment returns, and the expected date of retirement, i.e., when earned income stops and the income flow is dependent upon investments, Social Security, and pensions, if any.

In the absence of problematical events, it's entirely possible that the path will be smooth.  Even so, things change and that's the rub.

If inflation rises substantially, but investment returns do not follow suit, you may have to withdraw from your assets, which may wither away slowly rather than rising.  Or if health issues arise and you are unable to continue working until the planned retirement age, that, too, will be disruptive.

Far worse would be a situation involving the need for long-term care, either at home or in a facility.  Should this occur, unplanned expenses could soar.  Many of us will need long-term care of some sort and it's likely that one out of three will require care at a nursing facility.  That's not a pleasant prospect, but it's one for which insurance is available.  Long-term care insurance, however, if available, is extremely costly.

When you have children, there's usually the matter of saving for their education.  For a baby born today, the four-year cost of a private university could easily be $500,000 when they're ready to attend.  At a public university, figure half that.

If one's plan includes leaving an inheritance for the generations to follow, there's all the more reason to make efforts to limit the need to draw down funds from your saved assets. 

Oh yes, and let's not forget about things like wills, powers of attorney, and health care proxies, all of which need to be take care of.

A financial plan is not about getting rich, and you don't have to be rich to create one.  It's about doing more with what you have.

And sleeping well at night.


N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more