Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 29, 2020

Fund Facts

Navigating the world of mutual funds can be an interesting adventure.  Indeed, for other than professionals (and probably for some of them), working one’s way through this forest of some 8,000 funds may be overwhelming.  Even so, here is some assistance in understanding.

Mutual funds have been around for decades.  They become popular in the 1970s and 1980s.  Fifty years ago, most funds were load funds.  Load is another word for sales charge.  Back then, it was not uncommon for load funds to have initial charges of 8% or so when making investments.  So on Day One, your $100,000 investment was worth only $92,000.

As time passed, investors became increasingly concerned about these sales charges.  Then several things happened.  The mutual fund companies created different classes of shares.  Typically, Class A included the stated load when the initial investment was made.  For investors who balked at that, they created Class B, which had no charge up front.  The hitch was that the charge was applied when shares were sold.  

Some folks were uncomfortable with either of these charges, which led to Class C.  Class C came with no front- or back-end charges.  It did, however, come with an annual fee.

All of these fees were in addition to the ongoing administrative and management fees, which were usually in the range of 1% to 2% per year.  These fees in aggregate were increasingly resisted and the universe of no-load (no sales charge) funds emerged.  Today, no-load funds are dominant.

In addition to the matter of fees, it’s important to be wary of duplication of underlying holdings. That’s especially true when considering the largest funds.  Why? Because as assets under management increase, fund managers have to focus on stocks that are actively traded, i.e., highly liquid.  They must buy huge positions.  For that reason, as the fund’s assets increase, the range of investment choices decreases.  It should come as no surprise, therefore, that there is considerable duplication of underlying holdings among the biggest funds.

Accordingly, it’s a good idea to avoid huge funds and concentrate on mid-sized funds.  Smaller funds may also be of interest, though one would be well advised to limit consideration to those with $100 million or more under management so that the fund’s expense ratio is within a reasonable range.

Pay attention also to the tenure of the fund’s manager.  Often, investors are tempted to concentrate on funds that have had the best returns in recent years.  This may not a wise approach.  What is wise is noting the tenure of the current fund manager.  If the manager has been aboard for an extended period, the fund’s record is that manager’s record.  But if it’s a new manager, it is essentially a new fund.

The task of sifting through the pile of fund information may be challenging, but these guidelines should help avoid mistakes that might otherwise be problematical.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP


Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t