Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020


Fixed Income: In a Fix

Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.  Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.  The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return.

The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.  What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.  

To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting that the odds will be on their side.  In the short run, psychology is more likely to be the driving force behind stock movements.

Bonds and other fixed income instruments are more dependable, but not necessarily more promising.  There are several basic considerations to keep in mind.  If everything else is constant, the higher the quality rating, the greater the safety.  When safety is higher, however, the interest to be paid will be lower.

Bond ratings from Standard & Poor’s range from AAA down to D.  Although a school grade of B might have been OK, bonds rated at BB or below are known as bad bonds.  It gets worse going down the scale.

Another important consideration is maturity.  The longer the maturity, the longer the time when problems may develop, which is why longer maturities generally have higher interest yields.  That is the problem we face today.

Over the last 40 years, prevailing interest rates have fallen steadily from the mid-teens to just above zero.  Barring the unlikely possibility that they will go lower (and into negative territory), they will either stay where they are or rise in the future.  When rates rise, bond prices will fall. 

The problem for investors is that the combination of extraordinarily low current rates and the prospect of rising inflation suggests the likelihood of higher interest rates over the next few years.  So in the wake of the recent four-decade rally in bond prices as rates dropped, we are facing the probability of a marked about face and far more limited worthwhile opportunities in that asset class.

For that reason and despite the greater volatility of equities, there is a concerted movement toward an increased equity component and a proportionate reduction on the fixed income side.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®
nrwayne@soundasset.com
www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more