Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 15, 2020


“An ingenious modern game of chance in which the player is permitted to enjoy the comfortable conviction that he is beating the man who keeps the table.”
Ambrose Bierce

One can only marvel at the broad scope of insurance schemes created in the pursuit of fat commissions for insurance agents.  From the simplest plans, such as whole life, to the ultracomplex, which no one understands but promises to provide rewards beyond one’s wildest dreams, it’s an area where fear and greed work together to soften the brain of the buyer and enrich the pocketbook of the seller.  

There are certainly risks requiring the protection of properly selected insurance, but the range of products developed to generate hefty ongoing profits is ever-expanding.  The industry continues its efforts to stay ahead of people who are struggling to understand what these products are and why they need them.

One example is life insurance, which has numerous permutations.  Life insurance is needed to provide protection for lost income when a spouse dies, mortgage debt, and education for children.  These specific risks are well covered by term insurance, which is far less costly than whole life.  The latter, typically sold as a worthwhile investment (which it is not), is more expensive and tends to generate more substantial commissions for the selling agents.

Annuities are worse.  They come in two varieties: fixed and variable.  Both bring big commissions to the sellers.

Fixed annuities, in their simplest form, are akin to rolling the dice.  The agreement provides the annuitant with a regular fixed payment over his/her lifetime.  If you live longer than statistics suggest, you may be a winner.  If you’re gone quickly, you lose and the company wins.  Why?  Because when you buy the policy, you transfer a specified amount of money to the insurance company with no possibility of return.  

For fixed annuities, there are variations both in terms of timing and survivor’s rights that reduce the risk to the buyer, but these variations lower the ongoing payment stream.

Variable annuities are quite different.  For one thing, the funds transferred can be withdrawn.  For another, there is usually no ongoing stream of income.  Their best and perhaps only worthwhile use is as an option for tax-deferred investing when all other ways of sheltering income have been exhausted.  But like most insurance products, the fees for variables can be nosebleed high.  

And then there are the ultracomplex schemes that require sophistication and concentration to decipher the techniques involved in outwitting the IRS, leading to newly found avenues of wealth preservation and enhancement.  Here, too, if it sounds too good to be true, it is too good to be true.  

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®


Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t