Skip to main content

Sound Advice: June 10, 2020

Tuna Fish
Some years ago, I had lunch with Bob Brimmer, an old friend and veteran adviser from Cape Cod.  We chatted about how people’s behavior as investors is often less rational than their behavior in most other areas where money is involved.  Bob gave an example, citing what we now refer to as the tuna fish principle.  
Let’s say a can of tuna fish normally sells for $1.50.  If the price soars to $5 a can, very few people will be buyers.  But if the price plunges to 50 cents a can, it will sell out almost immediately.
Yet with stock market investing, people do the exact opposite.  When prices drop, the last thing they are willing to do is buy, even though it’s probably the best possible time to get on board.  And (you guessed it!), as prices go higher, that is when they want to buy.  This is a sure formula for disappointment.
Now that almost two and a half months have passed since March 23rd, what seems to have been the recent market bottom, it’s easy to remember widespread investor panic prompted by the rapid onset of the pandemic.  About 11 years earlier, there was a similar wave of fear as the worldwide banking system barely escaped shutting down.
Both times, extreme fear brought extremely good value.  Wall Streeters gauge fear by what’s known as the VIX -- the volatility index -- which can be googled easily at any time. 
When fear seems to be everywhere, the VIX may spike to 40 or higher.  That’s often a good time to buy.  Baron Rothschild, an 18th-century British nobleman and member of the Rothschild banking family, is credited with saying that “the time to buy is when there’s blood in the streets.”
When investor confidence gets high, the VIX is typically somewhere in the teens.  At the moment, it’s in the mid-20s. 
If we apply the principle now, the price of tuna fish is rising and folks seem even more interested in buying.  Go figure!  Sound advice would be to stock up when the price is lower. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®
nrwayne@soundasset.com
www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more