Skip to main content

Sound Advice: June 3, 2020

Economists

“The First Law of Economists:  For every economist, there exists an equal and opposite economist. The Second Law of Economists: They're both wrong.”
Only a few short months ago, during an online seminar for financial professionals, Joe Davis, Vanguard’s Chief Global Economist and head of Vanguard’s Global Investment Strategy Group, said there would be no recession in 2020.  
Back in January, Jeremy Siegel, the well-known finance professor from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, waxed enthusiastic about valuations of stocks in the 20 times earnings range and he looked for even more annual gains ahead.
They were both wrong.
Approaching midyear, we are in a marked recession that is not going away anytime soon, despite the hefty, albeit temporary, rebound in market averages in April and May.  Five weeks or so from now, earnings reports for the second calendar quarter will start to be released.  The comparisons will be dreadful.  
Despite relaxation of social distancing rules in some parts of the country, there is every reason to expect more bad news from Corporate America for at least the remainder of this year . . . and possibly beyond.
The damage will not be universal.  Due to extended periods of social isolation, digital communication and the technology that supports it will prosper.  Brick-and-mortar retail stores will be hammered, but e-commerce sales will continue to soar, as they have already.  Wherever there is demand for interaction, whether social or commercial, the cyber world will benefit.
What will separate the fortunate businesses from those that are struggling will be the degree of risk associated with each and the prospect of an imminent treatment and/or vaccine.  No doubt there will be one, but the question is when.  My guess is that it will be early-to-mid 2021, but even that is based on an acceleration of medical research and testing requiring considerable optimism.
Our economic rebound will begin when people regain the confidence needed to resume activities that had been the mainstays of their lives.  It is not confidence that prompts us now to go to supermarkets, pharmacies, and gas stations.  It is basic need for which there are few, if any, options.
In some parts of the country, restaurants are opening (with sharply defined spacing between tables) and public areas are beckoning as warm weather returns.  This is good news and bad news.  The risk of infection is as high as ever and the reality is that nothing has changed other than the season.
As colder weather sets in this coming fall, the situation will not be much different from what we have just gone through.  The current period of opening up may well lead to an accelerated rate of new infection by autumn along with no near-term progress on treatments.
Unfortunately, the latest news is that the mid-May announcement by Moderna of early progress on initial testing of a new vaccine, which was accompanied by a major offering of Moderna stock, is now under investigation by federal securities regulators.
Let’s not forget the huge number of unemployed people, over 40 million as of last week.  Although the majority of them expect that their layoffs will be temporary, we have seen estimates that suggest 40% will be permanently out of work.  When you read the news about nationwide rioting, keep in mind the probability that this undercurrent is a driving force behind unrest and will continue into the future.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®
www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...