Skip to main content

Sound Advice: May 27, 2020


As we move along through this virus-infected year, it is becoming clear that several critical oppositions are developing.  Prime examples include big companies versus small companies; employed versus unemployed; and the stock market versus the economy.

The enormous financial stress of the pandemic has fallen hardest on those with the leanest resources.  That’s true for both companies and families.  The biggest companies with the most substantial resources are well positioned to weather this storm.  Smaller companies, however, tend to have limited reserves, which means that many will not survive.  Although others will someday replace them, it will take time, which suggests that the big companies will get even bigger and end up net ahead.

The situation for families is more complicated.  Less affluent families must survive since there will be mouths to feed.  Temporary fixes, whether for a few weeks or months, will not be enough. 

As the millions of unemployed search for work, they will be confronting a continuation of a trend that’s been under way for years: the elimination of human workers from U.S. factories.  The main reason is automation, not the transfer of jobs to countries where labor rates are much lower, but the effect is the same either way.

Given our ongoing concerns about keeping factories humming while keeping workers safe, one can bet that the trend toward automation will only accelerate.  From the perspective of safety, this is good news.  But from the perspective of job availability, it’s one more reason why the current extraordinary level of unemployment is extremely disturbing.

With 35-plus million folks now unemployed, the specter of a 20% unemployment rate may be the biggest problem we will be facing.  Recent news reports suggested that 80% of those unemployed considered their layoffs temporary, but that optimism is probably misplaced.  Why?  Because a substantial share of this group was probably working for companies that will no longer be around. 

The numbers of unemployed with remain unusually high for years.  One remedy might be a massive infrastructure program, akin to the WPA of the 1930s.  Whether that would be saleable politically is another story.

Another approach could be a nationwide training curriculum to develop the skills needed for the tasks of our new normal business world.

In the absence of measures of magnitude such as these, millions of unemployed people will become increasingly desperate, leading to violence and crime.

Meanwhile, there is a disconnect between the behavior of the stock market and the reality of the economy.  Stock prices continue to rebound while corporate profits vanish.  Larger companies will benefit from the disappearance of smaller competitors, gain during this difficult period, and enjoy a deserved increase in the price of their shares. 

To the extent that the stock market averages are disproportionately influenced by the successes of the largest companies, there is a basis for the recent recovery we have seen.  Let us hope these market leaders can take up enough slack to provide increased day-to-day stability as we move ahead and also that new smaller businesses able to provide millions of jobs will flourish again.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®


Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t