Skip to main content

Sound Advice: May 27, 2020


Disconnect

As we move along through this virus-infected year, it is becoming clear that several critical oppositions are developing.  Prime examples include big companies versus small companies; employed versus unemployed; and the stock market versus the economy.

The enormous financial stress of the pandemic has fallen hardest on those with the leanest resources.  That’s true for both companies and families.  The biggest companies with the most substantial resources are well positioned to weather this storm.  Smaller companies, however, tend to have limited reserves, which means that many will not survive.  Although others will someday replace them, it will take time, which suggests that the big companies will get even bigger and end up net ahead.

The situation for families is more complicated.  Less affluent families must survive since there will be mouths to feed.  Temporary fixes, whether for a few weeks or months, will not be enough. 

As the millions of unemployed search for work, they will be confronting a continuation of a trend that’s been under way for years: the elimination of human workers from U.S. factories.  The main reason is automation, not the transfer of jobs to countries where labor rates are much lower, but the effect is the same either way.

Given our ongoing concerns about keeping factories humming while keeping workers safe, one can bet that the trend toward automation will only accelerate.  From the perspective of safety, this is good news.  But from the perspective of job availability, it’s one more reason why the current extraordinary level of unemployment is extremely disturbing.

With 35-plus million folks now unemployed, the specter of a 20% unemployment rate may be the biggest problem we will be facing.  Recent news reports suggested that 80% of those unemployed considered their layoffs temporary, but that optimism is probably misplaced.  Why?  Because a substantial share of this group was probably working for companies that will no longer be around. 

The numbers of unemployed with remain unusually high for years.  One remedy might be a massive infrastructure program, akin to the WPA of the 1930s.  Whether that would be saleable politically is another story.

Another approach could be a nationwide training curriculum to develop the skills needed for the tasks of our new normal business world.

In the absence of measures of magnitude such as these, millions of unemployed people will become increasingly desperate, leading to violence and crime.

Meanwhile, there is a disconnect between the behavior of the stock market and the reality of the economy.  Stock prices continue to rebound while corporate profits vanish.  Larger companies will benefit from the disappearance of smaller competitors, gain during this difficult period, and enjoy a deserved increase in the price of their shares. 

To the extent that the stock market averages are disproportionately influenced by the successes of the largest companies, there is a basis for the recent recovery we have seen.  Let us hope these market leaders can take up enough slack to provide increased day-to-day stability as we move ahead and also that new smaller businesses able to provide millions of jobs will flourish again.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: November 10, 2025

The stock market indexes seem to be dominated by a handful of tech stocks, but how is the average stock doing? As of late October/early November 2025, the S&P 500 index excluding the Magnificent Seven stocks (the "Other 493") has delivered a modest year-to-date return of approximately 5.3% to 5.4%. That’s barely more than one third of the performance of the full, market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 index, which was up around 15.1% to 16% over the same period.  (The Magnificent Seven stocks are Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla.) Index Concentration and Market Breadth The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index underperformed the standard, cap-weighted S&P 500 by about 12% in 2024, reflecting the gap between the top performing giants and the rest of the market. Only sectors like utilities, industrials, real estate, and energy outperformed their cap-weighted peers, while tech and consumer-focused sectors were ...
Post a Comment
Read more