Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 18, 2026

Will AI improve my investment results?

AI can help your investing mainly by lowering costs, automating good behavior, and making information easier to process, not by giving you a magic “beat the market” button. Whether it improves your results depends entirely on how you use it and whether it reinforces, rather than undermines, a disciplined, index‑oriented plan.​

Where AI can genuinely help

  • Decision support: Well‑designed tools can nudge you toward better diversification, appropriate risk levels, and avoiding obvious mistakes, which can modestly improve long‑term outcomes. Some studies find AI models can forecast earnings changes and trading signals more accurately than human analysts in specific contexts, though that does not automatically translate into higher net returns for typical retail portfolios.​
  • Automation and robo‑advisors: Automated services generally build low‑cost, diversified ETF portfolios and rebalance them for you, which mainly helps by keeping you invested, reducing frictions, and preventing behavioral errors.​

Where the benefit is limited or risky

  • “AI trading” platforms: Algorithmic and AI‑driven trading is now widespread, but the edge largely accrues to institutional players with scale, data, and infrastructure; retail access to similar tools does not erase that structural gap. Using AI to chase signals, options strategies or high‑frequency trades can easily increase turnover, costs, and taxes without reliably improving risk‑adjusted returns.​
  • Overtrust and “AI validation”: Many retail investors are seeking AI tools that tell them their portfolio is great or identify “smart” picks, yet early evidence shows these tools can be inaccurate, biased or overconfident, and users may follow them too blindly.​

How to use AI without derailing your plan

  • Treat AI as a tool, not an oracle: Use it for tasks like summarizing disclosures, comparing fees, stress‑testing allocations or checking diversification, while keeping your core in broad, low‑cost index funds that target market returns.​
  • Protect against the downside: Be skeptical of any AI‑branded product promising outperformance or “proprietary” signals, and remember that scams are increasingly using AI buzzwords to appear sophisticated.​

For your specific style

  • Given your preference for total‑market, evidence‑based investing, AI is most likely to help by tightening execution around that same strategy—asset allocation, tax‑loss harvesting, and behavior control—rather than by stock picking or market timing.​
  • A practical approach is to let automation handle the boring, rules‑based parts (rebalancing, cash sweeps, drift monitoring) while you keep high‑level control over risk, costs, and staying the course through noise.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more